
Decreasing American support highlights need for Israeli self-sufficiency
The goal is simple: Israel’s operational readiness must never hinge on a vote in Washington.

The goal is simple: Israel’s operational readiness must never hinge on a vote in Washington.

Anything less is a recipe for ongoing war.

Ceasefire agreements with Lebanon are useless, analysts say

Territorial loss is a visceral and permanent marker of defeat, whereas military setbacks are often framed as temporary “calamities” that can be recovered from.

Videos showing PA security forces conducting sophisticated, large-scale maneuvers—including urban warfare drills that simulate conquering towns—has significantly heightened concerns within the Israeli security establishment.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan continues to demonize the Jewish State and recently threatened to attack Israel.

IDF soldiers have found Arabic translations of Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” in numerous homes, command centers, and mosques, in both Gaza and Lebanon.

Iran has fired over a thousand rockets at Israeli civilian centers, while Israel has refrained from targeting neighborhoods where regime elites live.

‘If the fighting resumes, Iran will enter it from a weaker position, while Israel and the United States have a significant operational advantage.’

The key difference in the two attacks is the scale and leadership loss.

After the “Beeper” operation, which injured thousands of Hezbollah operatives via their communication devices, the IDF gained a far deeper understanding of the organization’s architecture.

Many claim that Netanyahu’s messaging is influenced by political considerations, including his relationship with President Donald Trump.

Critics say this sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that nations can escape military defeat by holding global energy markets hostage.

Through arms deals with Hezbollah on the Syrian black market, al-Julani’s men are supplying them with weapons cheaply.

Overall we can see many significant achievements and yet some critical tasks remain unfinished.

While the missiles themselves—including the Emad, Shahab-3, and Khaibar Shekan—remain safe under hundreds of meters of granite, their utility is crippled if they cannot reach the surface.

If Tehran attempts to choke off global energy flows, it exposes its own exports to the same vulnerability.

By Hezy Laing For over a decade, Iran’s nuclear program has been the target of a high-stakes “shadow war” characterized by sophisticated Mossad-led assassinations. While

Iran’s state media amplifies Barak’s warnings that a war with Iran could slide into a “prolonged phase of stagnation” similar to the U.S. experiences in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Despite the huge media hype regarding a potential peace deal, the announcement is likely nothing more than a strategic feint designed to keep Tehran off-balance.