Most fail because they were built for a an older type of warfare.
By Hezy Laing
There are many air‑defense systems available in the world – but few of them function properly.
Most fail because they were built for a different kind of war.
Traditional systems such as the American Patriot PAC‑2, the Russian S‑300, and the Syrian Pantsir‑S1 were designed to intercept a small number of high‑value threats like aircraft or the occasional ballistic missile.
They were never engineered to withstand the modern battlefield’s defining challenge: enormous saturation attacks of cheap rockets, mortars, and drones fired in massive volleys.
When Hamas launches 4,000 rockets in eleven days or Hezbollah fires 150 rockets in a single minute, these older systems run out of interceptors, tracking capacity, or both.
Their radars can be overwhelmed, their engagement algorithms are too slow, and their interceptors are far too expensive to fire at low‑cost threats.
Iron Dome succeeds precisely because it was designed from the ground up for this new reality.
Developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries and operational since 2011, Iron Dome uses the EL/M‑2084 multi‑mission radar, which can track hundreds of projectiles simultaneously and calculate their trajectories within seconds.
Its Tamir interceptor costs roughly $50,000, compared to the Patriot PAC‑3 MSE interceptor, which costs around $3 million.
This cost difference is crucial because Iron Dome is meant to fire thousands of interceptors in a short period, something traditional systems cannot afford to do.
Even more importantly, Iron Dome only fires at rockets projected to hit populated areas, ignoring those headed for open fields.
This selective‑engagement logic preserves interceptor stockpiles and dramatically reduces operating costs during heavy barrages.
The system’s performance in real conflicts has been unprecedented.
During Operation Protective Edge in 2014, Iron Dome achieved an interception rate of roughly 90 percent.
In the May 2021 conflict, it intercepted more than 1,500 rockets with a success rate again above 90 percent, despite Hamas launching over 4,300 rockets in eleven days.
During the October 2023 war, Iron Dome faced the largest rocket salvos in Israel’s history, including barrages of 150 rockets fired within seconds.
Even under these extreme conditions, the system maintained an estimated interception rate between 85 and 95 percent, depending on the region and density of fire.
Most air‑defense systems fail because they are too slow, too expensive, or too limited to handle saturation attacks.
Iron Dome works because it combines fast radar, smart algorithms, and affordable interceptors — a system built not for yesterday’s threats, but for today’s rocket‑saturated battlefield.
